Updated: Follow The Finger

Quote And Attribution

0:02 SPEAKER_00: Quote.

0:03 SPEAKER_00: Every allegation comes from the detective.

0:06 SPEAKER_00: Dr.

0:06 SPEAKER_00: John Ewell, forensic psychologist.

0:09 SPEAKER_00: End quote.

Source Link And Setup

0:10 SPEAKER_00: More information with the transcript statements can be found at www.consider.click slash two G Z.

Follow The Finger Cue

0:19 SPEAKER_00: Follow the finger.

0:21 SPEAKER_00: Follow the finger.

0:22 SPEAKER_00: Prosecutors.

0:23 SPEAKER_00: Police and scripted accusations.

Yearlong Grooming Of Accusations

0:26 SPEAKER_00: Enum Claw Detective Grant McCall and his co-conspirator had been grooming false accusations for over a year.

0:32 SPEAKER_00: The hostile effects of the hate crime had been going on long before this scripted accusation.

Recording Stops And Story Shifts

0:37 SPEAKER_00: In short, Enum Claw Detective Grant McCall terminated the recording, and upon resuming, the testimony of the manipulated accuser had undergone a complete transformation.

Evidence Of Orchestrated Hate Crime

0:49 SPEAKER_00: The follow-the-finger testimony serves as compelling evidence of an orchestrated hate crime.

0:56 SPEAKER_00: In a solitary meeting, sitting alone with the manipulated accuser, City of Enum Claw detective Grant McCall engages with the manipulated accuser, introducing inappropriate suggestions involving both the vagina and anus.

1:11 SPEAKER_00: When the manipulated accuser hesitates, McCall abruptly stops the recording to take a break.

Refusal To Investigate The Scene

1:18 SPEAKER_00: It's important to note that McCall has previously deleted evidence and ignored the actual allegations to the point of refusing to investigate the location where the alleged abuse had taken place.

1:31 SPEAKER_00: Detective Grant McCall knew that if the home had been examined, the crime would have been impossible to commit.

Prosecutorial Approval And Paused Recorder

1:38 SPEAKER_00: With the approval of King County prosecutors and judges, Detective McCall prompts the accuser for specific responses and pauses the recording to take a little break.

1:49 SPEAKER_00: When there is no immediate reply regarding the anal suggestion, McCall calls for a break, shutting off the recorder once again, keeping in mind that McCall had already deleted crucial evidence.

Breaks Precede Narrative Changes

2:02 SPEAKER_00: During the break, the narrative of accusations miraculously alters.

2:07 SPEAKER_00: Detective Grant McCall switches off the recorder, influences the false accuser, and upon resuming, the story has transformed.

Transcript: Pre‑Break Denials

2:16 SPEAKER_00: The transcript reads as follows.

2:18 SPEAKER_00: Detective Grant McCall.

2:20 SPEAKER_00: And you're certain his fingers didn't penetrate your vagina?

2:24 SPEAKER_00: Manipulated accuser.

2:26 SPEAKER_00: Yes.

2:27 SPEAKER_00: Detective Grant McCall.

2:29 SPEAKER_00: What about your anus?

2:31 SPEAKER_00: It's alright if you want to take a little break.

2:33 SPEAKER_00: Manipulated accuser?

2:35 SPEAKER_00: Unintelligible.

2:37 SPEAKER_00: Just moments after the recording restarts, Detective McCall simply says, okay.

Post‑Break Alignment With Detective

2:44 SPEAKER_00: No further commentary from McCall.

2:46 SPEAKER_00: But now, post-break, the manipulated accuser has crafted a narrative that aligns perfectly with McCall's objectives.

2:54 SPEAKER_00: Instantly, upon McCall's okay, the manipulated accuser begins fabricating a story about conspiring events.

3:03 SPEAKER_00: The manipulated accuser explicitly stated, never like penetrated me or anything.

Penetration Claim Misrepresented At Trial

3:09 SPEAKER_00: King County prosecutors in Seattle subsequently misrepresented the assertion before a jury that the manipulated accuser had always claimed penetration by a finger.

3:19 SPEAKER_00: City of Enum Clause Grant McCall coordinated the false accusations while his accomplice groomed the situation, creating a multi-tiered scenario surrounding a hate crime.

Prosecutors And Judge Amplify The Story

3:31 SPEAKER_00: Prosecutor Jason Simmons and his team embraced these fabricated claims and reshaped them into a harmful narrative aimed at a righteous Christian church they aimed to undermine.

3:42 SPEAKER_00: Judge Laurie K.

3:44 SPEAKER_00: Smith colluded with the prosecutors to systematically obliterate truth and violate the rights of the accused.

3:50 SPEAKER_00: In his closing arguments, prosecutor Jason Simmons claimed the manipulated accuser had previously disclosed abuse to social services.

4:00 SPEAKER_00: This disinformation tactic distorted the truth to an egregious extent.

4:05 SPEAKER_00: The manipulated accuser merely indicated to social services that she had been abused, lacking any specific details other than that no penetration occurred again definitively.

Felony Requires Penetration Element

4:18 SPEAKER_00: No penetration had taken place.

4:22 SPEAKER_00: To elevate the allegations to a felony status, Detective McCall needed to introduce an assertion of penetration.

4:30 SPEAKER_00: Detective Grant McCall suggested and guided the accuser to assert that a finger had been inserted.

4:36 SPEAKER_00: At that instant, the manipulated accuser displayed hesitation, stumbling over her words.

Break Leads To Fabricated Detail

4:43 SPEAKER_00: Detective McCall then halted the recording to claim they would take a break.

4:48 SPEAKER_00: Upon resuming, the fabricated narrative regarding finger insertion began to take shape.

4:54 SPEAKER_00: Judge Lori K.

4:55 SPEAKER_00: Smith and prosecutor Jason Simmons solidified this contrived falsehood during the trial as if the manipulated accuser had consistently maintained this story from the outset.

Expert Condemns Interview Method

5:07 SPEAKER_00: In reality, the claim of a finger event originated entirely from Enum Claw detective Grant McCall.

5:15 SPEAKER_00: This is not a mere questionable allegation.

5:18 SPEAKER_00: It represents a criminal act concealed by the King County prosecutors of Seattle, Washington.

5:25 SPEAKER_02: And every allegation comes from the detective.

5:32 SPEAKER_02: Well, my uh my overall uh comment was that this is uh an absolutely terrible interview.

5:40 SPEAKER_01: Did Detective McCall ever give an opportunity for a narrative response?

5:47 SPEAKER_02: No.

5:48 SPEAKER_01: Does this interview adhere to the basic tenets of the Washington state guidelines?

5:54 SPEAKER_02: No.

5:56 SPEAKER_02: I mean, this entire interview is not acceptable.

5:59 SPEAKER_02: Every single act, alleged act, is is suggested first by the officer and um every act?

6:08 SPEAKER_02: Yes, every act.

6:10 SPEAKER_02: So the act that just talks about touching the chest and touching the crotch first.

6:15 SPEAKER_02: He talks about uh him touching, or excuse me, the complainant touching the accused first.