Jury Verdict Illusions: Prosecutorial Tactics and Historical Injustice
The latest episode critically examines the flawed nature of jury verdicts and the systemic issues surrounding jury selection. By exploring historical and contemporary examples, we reveal how biases and the lack of calls for reform contribute to a compromised judicial process.
• The examination of jury roles and public perception
• Discussion on the manipulation of jury selection by prosecutors
• Historical examples of wrongful convictions and their impact
• The absence of serious calls for jury reform in the legal system
• The importance of informed jurors for fair outcomes
Visit us at wwwconsiderinfo.
www.consider.info
Speaker 1: The following is a reading of the post entitled but a Jury Found them Guilty.
Speaker 1: This reading has been edited for this format and may differ slightly from the actual post.
Speaker 1: The post's ID number is 9967 and can be found at wwwconsiderinfo.
Speaker 1: But a jury found them guilty.
Speaker 1: Non-thinking individuals often declare but a jury found them guilty.
Speaker 1: Non-thinking individuals often declare Well then, with that simple logic, nazi juries that sentenced Jews were correct and the Jim Crow-era lynchings in the Deep South were carried out under the guise of justice.
Speaker 1: Consider Seattle, washington.
Speaker 1: When Christianity is in the crosshairs, there's little doubt about what the outcome will be Jury selection joke.
Speaker 1: Washington state prosecutors once told a jury pool that jury selection is a dog and pony show.
Speaker 1: This is why you never, ever hear a whisper from prosecutors calling for jury reform.
Speaker 1: Prosecutors never cry out for stricter laws to obtain top-tier jurors.
Speaker 1: Informed jurors would create stronger, more critical thinkers, and that is precisely the kind of jury prosecutors don't want.
Speaker 1: Prosecutors around the country have thousands of tricks up their sleeve, backed by black-robed judges, to create the best fools for the state.
Speaker 1: So you never, ever hear a whimper about jury reform.
Speaker 1: The informed juror threatens the prosecution's power, which is why the police, prosecutors and judges typically oppose such reforms.
Speaker 1: Whether prosecutors, police or judges need a not-guilty verdict for a cop on trial or a guilty verdict for someone they've targeted, jury selection remains an absolute joke.
Speaker 1: This is why God instructs us never to follow the crowd.
Speaker 1: Do not follow the crowd in doing wrong.
Speaker 1: When you give testimony in a lawsuit, do not pervert justice by siding with the crowd.
Speaker 1: Exodus 23, 2.
Speaker 1: Prosecutors and Jury.
Speaker 1: One of the most extensive legal farces within the court system is a jury's verdict of guilty or not guilty.
Speaker 1: Why?
Speaker 1: Because juries are only as sound as the society and community.
Speaker 1: They're drawn from Stupid in, stupid out, and prosecutors and judges know this.
Speaker 1: They actively seek out stupid in to guarantee stupid out.
Speaker 1: But a jury found them guilty is just a lazy statement used to avoid critical thinking.
Speaker 1: Consider this In Nazi Germany, courts often found Jews guilty.
Speaker 1: In the post-Civil War, jim Crow, deep South minorities were often found guilty.
Speaker 1: Does that make the verdict correct?
Speaker 1: In Seattle Washington, a jury found a Christian church and one of its members guilty when their beliefs caught the attention of hostile prosecutors.
Speaker 1: And now you know why.
Speaker 1: King County prosecutors call jury selection a dog and pony show.
Speaker 1: Do not be shocked when you hear of the jury verdicts that acquit guilty cops or crush innocent individuals.
Speaker 1: The jury pool is a children's waiting pool to the legal system.
Speaker 1: For more discussions about juries and justice, tune in to the Consider podcast examining today's wisdom, folly and madness.
Speaker 1: Visit us at wwwconsiderinfo.
Podbean